“Not everyone who says to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter the kingdom of heaven, but only the one who does the will of my Father who is in heaven.” – Jesus
As I read Matthew 7 this morning, this verse caught my eye. Actually, the heading above this verse that the NIV publishing people added caught my eye. It read “True and False Disciples”.
I found this concept interesting. We frequently hear about true and false prophets and teachers – in fact, Jesus has just been talking about false prophets the verse before – but I don’t know that I’ve ever heard the phrase “true and false disciples”.
A “false” anything is never good. Whenever we read about “false” people in the Bible, they are masquerading as something true and pure, usually purposefully (though not always) conniving to trick people into believing they are the real deal.
Can “disciples” do that? Can people pretend to be Christ followers but not really be believers? And, if so, are those who are “false disciples” always aware they are faking it, or do some of them genuinely believe they are biblical Christians?
The “false disciples” in this verse and the next are characterized as being people who a) believe Jesus exists, b) revere Him in some way, c) do supernatural things, like drive out demons and perform miracles, “in His name”, meaning they d) believe they are doing things that honor Him or, at the very least, require His lending them His authority and power (Matthew 7:21-22).
Why in the world, then, would Jesus reject these people, indicating in no uncertain terms that they are not true followers of Christ (Matthew 7:23)?
Jesus tells us why he would reject these people (and anyone else) back up in verse 21: they did not do the will of His Father in heaven.
How did they not?! They did all kinds of Christiany things. How can Jesus say they weren’t doing the Father’s will, and why does that have bearing on their salvation if we are saved by grace through faith and not by works (Ephesians 2:8-9)?
Jesus doesn’t spell out exactly what they weren’t doing, but we can deduct that what they were doing was not enough to a) earn their salvation, b) make them authentic Christ followers, and c) put them in God’s will.
In essence these people thought they were doing what God wanted them to do, but, somehow, they were not obeying Him.
Given that their external actions looked good, perhaps the problem of their disobedience was internal: their hearts weren’t in their actions. They were doing these “good things” for the wrong reasons, the primary of which was to earn a spot in heaven.
Earning our salvation is not God’s will. I know this because it can’t be done. There is no one righteous, not one (Romans 3:10). Jesus rejected these people because they didn’t have faith in Him to save them. They were trying to do it themselves.
If that’s not you, that’s great. If you know you are saved not because you do anything right (let alone everything) but because you believe sinless Jesus died on the cross for your sins, taking the punishment you deserve, giving you the reward He deserved, and the Father agreed to not hold you eternally accountable for your sins because you believe these things, that’s wonderful.
But don’t miss that verse 21 still has a strong word for us who have our salvation theology ducks in a row.
Jesus says of us kind of people, us “true disciples”, that we do the will of the Father.
Obedience – ACTING according to His will as it is laid out in scripture – is the sign of true, saving faith. Obedience doesn’t earn salvation, but it is the mark of the one who has been saved. Obedience is the proof in the pudding, if you will.
“Belief” that is not followed by obedience was never belief in the first place. This is true in all areas of our lives: we only do that which we believe.
For instance, I can say I believe eating a healthy diet and exercising regularly is best for my body. But I don’t do anything to act in accordance with that idea. In fact, I do the opposite. I eat junk and sit 15 of the 16 hours I am awake every single day.
Why? Because I am not truly convinced I ought to do otherwise. My twisted logic, my actual belief, is that making the food and exercise choices I make is somehow better than making the choices I don’t make. Yes, I will intellectually agree that I believe my body would be better off if I made healthy choices. But when the rubber meets the road and I have to make decisions, my “belief” is betrayed by my opposite actions. My true belief, whether I am conscious of it or not, is that unhealthy choices are better in some way than healthy choices.
We always act in accordance with our actual beliefs.
If you want to know what a man believes about anything, then, including God, watch what he does. If he runs in the opposite direction of the things espoused in scripture, no matter what he tells you or himself (we are super good at fooling ourselves), he is not a Christ-follower. If he does his best to pursue what God tells him to do in scripture, he is a Christ-follower.
Action is evidence of belief, for better or for worse.
What do your actions say about what you truly believe?
(Side note: you might argue that if we looked at the actions of the “false disciples”, we would say they are believers, doing things Jesus commanded His disciples to do. But if you observe them just a little while longer, you hear them appeal to Jesus that they should be received by Him because of their actions – not on account of their faith – a blatant violation of scripture. Their true beliefs come out in their actions – they are doing good things to earn salvation – and then verbally when they are informed their actions aren’t going to save them.)
I would like to offer some thoughts about this post which tackles a very difficult subject. Perhaps it will be useful, at least I hope it will be.
You said that “ACTING according to His will as it is laid out in scripture – is the sign of true, saving faith. Obedience doesn’t earn salvation, but it is the mark of the one who has been saved. Obedience is the proof in the pudding, if you will.”
I couldn’t agree more. It pains me though that so many think of “works’ when they hear obedience. That is not a problem when using the dictionary definition but it is a problem when works is defined as “any action taken”. When you define it as “any action taken” and then say ‘works do not save’ you take away the ability to demonstrate your faith that marks a person as a Christian. This removes the need to repent, confess, be baptized, live faithfully until death and even faith itself since it is a work (john 6:28-29). None of which earn your salvation but you can’t just say “I won’t obey these commands”
How can you be saved if you will not repent but you better not say “I repented therefore God owes me salvation”. It doesn’t follow. Likewise, I can stop sinning cold turkey and go 5 years sin free (yes, I am being hypothetical) and then die and those 5 years of sinlessness will not take care of the previous years (or day) of sinfulness before…only the blood of Jesus can do that.
Anyway, enjoyed the post.
I stumbled on your good article while doing some searches for faith articles. This line in your article gave me pause: “We always act in accordance with our actual beliefs.”
Do we? that line did not trigger a negative reaction—just that question. I’d like to know why you think there is always consistency between our actions and our “actual beliefs”.
If you feel inclined to spend the thought time and the typing time, I’d love another line or two on that? I’d risk a posit that we are capable of complex contradictions and inconsistencies and that even an apostle might not understand the connection between his beliefs and actions. (Ref. Rom. 7).
Thanks again!! And God bless. JP